Hello hello! Your editor here. Thank you so much for joining TME! 🎈

Zuversicht is a German word for a grounded, optimistic trust that things will turn out well, something I believe anyone working in climate and sustainability needs to cultivate. Not all news is good news in our beloved little green bubble, but we move forward with passion. Looking at things through the lens of possibility makes us more capable of action. After that brief bilingual philosophical moment, please enjoy this edition of TME, prepared with lots of Zuversicht! 🫶

🥸 Only 7 of 27 EU Member States meet the 1 September deadline to submit National Restoration Plans under the Nature Restoration Regulation

🌡 UNEP’s Limiting Overshoot report formalises that the 1.5°C ceiling will be breached, and puts the best-case century outcome at around 1.8°C

🌞 EU solar keeps posting monthly records: Spain, Portugal, France and Germany all set daily PV output highs in August

🌬 Amazon signs a 15-year, 600 MW offshore wind PPA with Skyborn’s Gennaker project, Germany’s largest corporate wind deal to date

EFRAG released the 2026 draft ESRS datapoints list, an explanatory note and a revised XBRL taxonomy consolidating the datapoints used across the ESRS as adopted by the European Commission on 3 July 2026 under the Omnibus package. The list categorises datapoints by data type and cross-references each one back to the original 2023 ESRS text and the 2025 simplified draft, so preparers can trace what has changed and what is retired. Stakeholders can report fatal flaws through EFRAG’s dedicated portal until 23 October 2026, with a final list expected before year-end.

Why it matters: the datapoints list, more than the ESRS text itself, is what CSRD preparers and software vendors actually build to; the fatal-flaw window is where remaining coding errors and definitional mismatches must be caught before they lock in for the 2028 filing cycle.

Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2026/871 and 2026/872, adopted on 21 April, entered into force on 17 August after their 20-day publication window in the Official Journal, and apply from 2 July to align with the parent ESG Ratings Regulation ((EU) 2024/3005). The first RTS specifies which elements of an ESG rating product must be disclosed to the public and to rated entities, including methodology, data sources, forward-looking assumptions and any conflicts of interest. The second RTS sets the measures ESG rating providers must implement to separate their rating activity from other lines of business, notably consulting, index construction and credit rating. Additional Delegated Regulations covering ESMA fees, fines and periodic penalty payments were published in the Official Journal over the summer.

Why it matters: the RTS convert the ESG Ratings Regulation from a governance-and-authorisation shell into a live supervision regime with disclosure standards and business-separation obligations ESMA can actually enforce from Q4 onwards.

Amazon and project developer Skyborn Renewables agreed a 15-year Power Purchase Agreement for 600 MW of offshore wind capacity from the Gennaker project, sited about 15 km off Germany’s Baltic coast in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The deal is Germany’s largest single corporate PPA on record and is expected to give Skyborn enough revenue certainty to reach Final Investment Decision on Gennaker, which would then generate enough electricity to power more than a million German households a year once fully commissioned. Alongside Gennaker, Amazon signed four new Swedish PPAs the same week, taking its Nordic carbon-free capacity to close to 1 GW.

Both companies frame the Gennaker offtake as directly underwriting hyperscale AI data-centre demand, in line with the IEA’s finding that AI-focused data-centre electricity use surged around 50% in 2025 and that the top five US hyperscalers’ capex is set to rise a further 75% in 2026. On that framing, this issue seats the Amazon-Gennaker deal in the summary-bar AI slot rather than running a thin standalone AI & Sustainability section, per the Section 14.3 cross-tag convention.

Why it matters: a 15-year offshore-wind PPA at this scale, negotiated by a hyperscaler rather than a utility, is the market price signal European regulators need to argue that AI compute demand can be met without derailing the corporate PPA market for smaller offtakers.

BloombergNEF’s H1 2026 Renewable Energy Investment Tracker, released on 28 August, puts co-located solar-plus-storage investment at a record $25 billion in the first half, nearly double H2 2025 and roughly triple H1 2025. Standalone solar PV investment fell 20% year-on-year to $75.4 billion, the lowest since the 2021 boom began, while total global renewable energy investment held broadly flat at $327.5 billion for the half. The US remained the second-largest market behind China and ahead of the EU, with year-on-year growth of 54%. BNEF reads the shift as a maturity signal. As PPA prices flatten and grid interconnection queues lengthen, investors will pay a premium for projects that arrive at the point of interconnection with dispatchable, revenue-certain output.

Why it matters: the co-location premium reprices utility-scale solar development economics across Europe as well, and puts additional pressure on Member States to accelerate grid connection reform if they want new build to keep pace with demand from AI and electrified transport.

UNEP released Limiting Overshoot: Navigating exceedance of 1.5°C and pathways towards return on 2 September, the first flagship UN assessment to state plainly that exceedance of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is now unavoidable on current policies and near-term trajectories. The long-term average used to define the target is expected to breach 1.5°C before the end of the decade, and the report frames roughly 1.8°C this century as the best remaining outcome on the current emissions trajectory. Executive Director Inger Andersen, in the 1 September launch briefing, put it directly: “Obviously, yes, we have climate procrastinated.”

The report reframes the policy question around an overshoot, peak and decline pathway: the lower the peak warming and the shorter the duration above 1.5°C, the lower the probability of crossing irreversible tipping points and adaptation limits. It reads across to CDR scale-up, methane and short-lived climate forcer action, and the design of country NDCs before COP31, and it lands three weeks before Climate Week NYC and roughly two months before CBD COP17. UNEP is explicit that overshoot is not an argument for resignation but for compressing peak warming and the return path.

Why it matters: the shift from “keep 1.5°C alive” to “overshoot, peak and decline” is the biggest recalibration of the global mitigation frame since Paris, and it changes what a credible corporate transition plan, a sovereign NDC and a durable removals portfolio have to price for.

Spain, Portugal, France and Germany all recorded new single-day photovoltaic output records in August 2026, extending the run of monthly milestones that saw solar supply 25% of EU electricity in June (52 TWh), making it the bloc’s largest single source of power for the first month on record ahead of nuclear, gas, wind, hydro and coal. Across 2026 to date, 18 EU Member States have set new monthly records for the share of electricity generated by solar, and Spain crossed 34% solar in June. The pattern is exactly what a fully repowering grid should look like: rising penetration, rising volatility, and rising system-service value for the storage and flexibility layer this issue’s BloombergNEF item priced.

Work on Climate. A free Slack-based community, now well past 40,000 members, that runs peer intros, hiring channels split by region and function, weekly office hours, and job-board scraping across most of the climate-native employer set (including many European employers and remote-anywhere roles that never surface on LinkedIn). Worth joining if you are between roles, exploring a lateral move into climate, or hiring, because the signal-to-noise on introductions is meaningfully higher than the paid networks currently charging for the same conversations. Free, no paywall, low-friction onboarding.

“How to Build a Low-tech Internet” (Kris De Decker, Low-tech Magazine, 2018). An essay that ages better every year the hyperscale AI story adds another gigawatt to a data-centre queue. De Decker walks through the mesh, packet-radio and store-and-forward architectures that actually delivered connectivity across rural India, remote Aboriginal Australia and post-earthquake Haiti at a small fraction of the energy and materials budget of the dominant model. Pairs directly with this issue’s Amazon-Gennaker item and the wider question of what an energy-honest internet would look like if compute demand had to fit within a finite generation stack.

Electricity Maps. A live world map of grid carbon intensity, updated every hour, colour-coded from clean (green) to fossil-heavy (dark brown), with a click-through per country or bidding zone showing the exact generation mix and cross-border imports at that moment. Five minutes clicking through Iberia at midday, France at midnight and Poland at any hour is a faster grid-intuition builder than most reports. Free in-browser, no account, no dark-pattern upsell; underlying data is open-source through the Electricity Maps API.

“Climate-aligned” is used to describe activities, portfolios or bonds that are said to be compatible with a 1.5°C or well-below-2°C pathway, without specifying which pathway, which baseline year, or how alignment is measured. The label was pushed into common finance usage from around 2018 to 2020 by transition-finance working groups at ICMA and Climate Bonds Initiative, and has since been picked up by index providers, ratings agencies and issuers because it sounds like “Paris-aligned” without carrying the same disclosure requirements. Issuers and asset managers benefit from a label that reads as a benchmark and functions as a marketing claim, given that no supervisor currently polices “alignment” the way the EU Taxonomy polices its own criteria. ESMA’s ongoing supervision of fund-name greenwashing and the SFDR 2.0 revision are the places where this ambiguity is most likely to be tightened next.

Some more short news available in the gallery version due to most inboxes’ length limits 😉

👍 Did you love it?! Yay! Please do share! 🤓

👎 Not so much? Oh, please hit reply and do tell us why so we can work on it. And by “us” and “we”, I mean me! 😁